Poor air quality at work is also an invisible cost: 44% of active workers estimate it to be over €100 per month per workstation.
Is workplace air quality a new hidden cost for French companies? OberA surveyed 3,100 active workers in France to provide quantified data on the concrete impact of a lack of air management — symptoms, absenteeism, decreased productivity, lost time, and direct costs — and to measure the actual cost for businesses.
Sommaire
- Deplorable workplace air quality for more than 1 in 2 French people
- Concrete effects on employees
- How many days of absence result from air quality?
- Significant consequences for productivity
- A direct challenge to performance and business continuity
- Lost time that quickly accumulates
- Resignations caused by poor air quality?
- Costs still unclear but very real
- An invisible but very real cost
- They talked about us
Deplorable workplace air quality for more than 1 in 2 French people
Over the last three months of 2026, 56% of active French people rate workplace air quality as average to very poor. Even though 43% consider it good or very good, this disparity highlights significant potential for improvement for companies.
| Answer | Result |
|---|---|
| Very good | |
| Good | |
| Average | |
| Poor | |
| Very poor | |
| I don’t know |
Concrete effects on employees
During January and early February — irritations (38%), difficulty concentrating (36%), headaches (31%).
And for those affected, it’s not anecdotal: 37% say these effects recur at least 2 to 3 times a week (25% frequently + 12% very frequently).
| Symptom | Result |
|---|---|
| Irritations (eyes/nose/throat) | |
| Difficulty concentrating | |
| Headaches | |
| Fatigue / drowsiness | |
| Cough | |
| Aggravated allergies / asthma | |
| None |
| Frequency | Result |
|---|---|
| Rare (1–2 times) | |
| Occasional (1×/week) | |
| Frequent (2–3×/week) | |
| Very frequent (≥4×/week) |
How many days of absence result from air quality?
Over the past 12 months, 59% of French people estimate they have had at least one day of absence related to symptoms occurring or aggravated by poor air quality at work — and 11% even report more than six days. The impact is therefore very concrete on activity, and absenteeism linked to the work environment appears to be a cost largely underestimated by companies.
| Number of days | Result |
|---|---|
| 0 | |
| 1–2 days | |
| 3–5 days | |
| 6–10 days | |
| More than 10 days | |
| I don’t know |
Significant consequences for productivity
When the air is judged average or poor — and 11% even speak of a loss greater than 20%.
These are far from occasional occurrences: 45% say they experience these days at least 3 days out of 4 weeks, including 16% for more than 10 days. A recurring phenomenon rather than a simple isolated incident.
| Decrease in efficiency | Result |
|---|---|
| 0 % | |
| 1–5% | |
| 6–10% | |
| 11–20% | |
| More than 20% | |
| I don’t know |
A direct challenge to performance and business continuity
During episodes of poor air quality, 41% of respondents observe a decrease in vigilance and nearly a quarter mention more frequent errors (23%) or rework (19%). Even more concerning, 17% report stoppages or slowdowns in activity, while only 29% observe no impact.
| Impact | Result |
|---|---|
| Decreased vigilance | |
| More frequent errors | |
| Rework or touch-ups | |
| Stoppages or slowdowns | |
| Internal customer complaints | |
| None |
Lost time that quickly accumulates
| Time lost | Result |
|---|---|
| Less than 15 min | |
| 15–30 min | |
| 30–60 min | |
| 1–2 hours | |
| More than 2 hours |
Resignations caused by poor air quality?
33% “a little”, 18% “a lot” — and 17% already consider it a reason for leaving.
Air quality is no longer a minor detail and is even becoming a concrete issue for employee engagement and talent retention. Indeed, 68% of respondents believe it affected their motivation or desire to stay with a company. The even more striking figure: 17% already consider it a reason for leaving.
| Answer | Result |
|---|---|
| Not at all | |
| A little | |
| A lot | |
| It’s a planned reason for leaving | |
| I don’t know |
Costs still unclear but very real
Indoor air problems also translate into very real costs: 38% of respondents estimate their company spent at least €1,000 over the year, and nearly one in ten (9%) even mention over €20k. But the most telling figure is that of people who do not express an opinion: 31% admit not knowing how to quantify these expenses, a sign that the weight of this cost item is still poorly measured.
| Annual estimate | Result |
|---|---|
| €0 | |
| Less than €1,000 | |
| €1,000 – €5,000 | |
| €5,000 – €20,000 | |
| More than €20,000 | |
| I don’t know |
An invisible but very real cost
According to 44% of French people, poor air quality costs their company at least €100 per month per workstation, with 19% estimating over €250 (and 9% over €500). Despite this quantified perception, 22% do not know how to estimate it, suggesting that productivity losses related to indoor air remain largely underestimated in organizations.
| Monthly estimate / workstation | Result |
|---|---|
| €0 | |
| €1–€25 | |
| €26–€50 | |
| €51–€100 | |
| €101–€250 | |
| €251–€500 | |
| €501–€1,000 | |
| More than €1,000 | |
| I don’t know |
“This survey shows that poor air at work is not just a feeling: it’s an operational cost, made up of lost productivity, absenteeism, and business disruptions. This reinforces OberA’s actions and leverages our expertise, which consists of quickly diagnosing causes, prioritizing effective actions, and transforming a blind spot into measurable gains for teams and the company.”
Methodology
Survey conducted among a representative sample of 3,100 active workers (employees, managers, and executives) residing in France, aged 18 and over.
Online survey conducted from February 13 to 24, 2026, via the BuzzPress respondent panel. Representativeness was ensured by the quota method (gender, age, region, socio-professional category, professional status, company size, and sector of activity), then by weighting based on INSEE data.
Company profiles: Services to individuals (27%) · Services to businesses (24%) · Public/parapublic sector (18%) · Industry/production (16%) · Construction/BTP (8%) · Transport/logistics (6%)








